Worst cities for dating

Hooking that hottie is hard enough without the odds stacked against you, so the city researchers at Sperling's Best Places have identified for you "America's Best and Worst Cities for Dating." The study is based on criteria that includes percentage of singles ages 18-24, population density, and dating venues per capita such as concerts, coffee shops, bars, bowling alleys, etc., and includes 80 metro areas in America. We teamed up with AXE Deodorant Bodyspray, which specializes in the dating game, to find out which city is revered as the D. The analysts at Wallet Hub recently ranked 182 cities to determine which are friendliest for the romantically unattached. Wallet Hub’s list was assembled based on 32 key factors, including what percentage of the city’s population is single, nightlife options per capita, and the cost of dating. There are no guarantees that a city will fulfill all your desires, as there is no one-size-fits-all for the coupled up or the single life.being single — you might want to explore your options. Given this fact, the worst cities for singles could be just about anywhere, really, but according to financial planning site Wallet Hub's analysis of 182 U. cities, there are definitely places worse than others for the single set to reside.Whether you love it or hate it (or feely deeply ambivalent about it), is one show that knew how to approach the complexities of single life.

If you’re unattached and in the process of finding a destination for your next move, be sure you’re looking at cities where you can pursue your own passions and favorite hobbies, because those cities are bound to attract others who are likeminded. “In addition to job and cost of living considerations, singles should choose a city that provides opportunities to explore their own interests and values,” Gonzalez says. In short, stay the hell away from South Burlington if you're on your own, because it's not big on local entertainment either — unless you count touring the Ben & Jerry's headquarters, that is.(Which could be a boon or a total disaster, depending on your relationship with Chunky Monkey.)Yes, it's home of some of the country's best and brightest intellectuals (hello, Yale), but New Haven, Connecticut (ranked 78/182) isn't necessarily ideal for singles.Taken together, these indicators are meant to give you a pretty good idea of “the opportunities that each city provides for its single population,” says Wallet Hub analyst Jill Gonzalez. What’s harder to capture in a report like this — and therefore isn’t addressed in Wallet Hub’s rankings — are the qualitative aspects of dating. Not only is it light on "Fun and Recreation" opportunities, but it also ranks awesomely low on Dating Opportunities, too.On top of all that, Glendale has some of the highest movie theatre costs in the country, so you can count out dinner and a movie if you're trying to have fun on the cheap.After all, it is cuffing season, and if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. Location also matters — so, if you’ve ever found yourself thinking, “Ugh, it’s terrible being single here,” you weren’t being dramatic. When it comes to quality of life for singles, not all cities are created equal! Clubs, bars, speakeasies, and late night hotspots aren't their strong suite, so if you prefer meeting people through dating apps or at the bookstore — or dates at home and in the quiet of the wilderness — then maybe this spot is for you.It's important to note that although the above-mentioned cities might be ranked as "bad" for singles and wannabe daters, beauty is still in the eye of the beholder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “worst cities for dating”